前言
出于工作需要和个人好奇，本文对UE重叠事件更新的主要函数UpdateOverlaps从源码的角度进行了详细的分析，通过阅读源码，深入理解重叠事件是如何被触发和更新的。
解决问题
阅读本文，你将得到至少以下问题的答案：
-
BeginComponentOverlap和EndComponentOverlap事件是如何被触发的？
-
UE是如何保存和管理组件之间的碰撞的？
-
SetActorEnableCollision是如何起到作用的？
-
UE如何处理不同Actor，或者同一个Actor里重复碰撞的情况？
以上只是提出了几个很基础的问题，随着源码的不断解析，还会有更多新的问题会被提出。
说是深入探究，更像是笔者个人的学习笔记。其中一些笔者认为本应被了解的细节不会被提起，请读者至少对UE的重叠机制有基础的理解。
重叠更新的入口:USceneComponent::UpdateOverlaps
Queries world and updates overlap tracking state for this component
当一个组件需要更新当前重叠状态时，就会调用这个函数。
这个函数定义在USceneComponent，表明只有场景组件的子类才能调用该函数。并且它不是一个虚函数，更新重叠相关的具体实现放在一个叫``UpdateOverlapsImpl的虚函数中。因此可以将UpdateOverlaps视作为重叠更新的总入口，然后调用子类的UpdateOverlapsImpl`从而执行具体的更新逻辑。
观察该函数的声明：
bool UpdateOverlaps(const TOverlapArrayView* PendingOverlaps = nullptr, bool bDoNotifies = true, const TOverlapArrayView* OverlapsAtEndLocation = nullptr);
其中，TOverlapArrayView就是经过了typedef的TArrayView.
FOverlapInfo是对FHitResult的一个简单封装，FHitResult相信大家都很熟悉了，通过使用FHitResult，我们可以很轻松的获得本次碰撞查询中碰撞到的组件，以及碰撞的各种信息，例如碰撞坐标，法线等等。
接下来对参数列表中三个参数进行讲解，这几个参数还是挺重要的，后面会反复使用到这三个参数。
NewPendingOverlaps
An ordered list of components that the MovedComponent overlapped during its movement (eg. generated during a sweep). Only used to add potentially new overlaps.
Might not be overlapping them now.
移动组件在移动过程中重叠的有序组件列表(例如:在扫描过程中生成)。仅用于添加潜在的新重叠。
说人话就是，本次碰撞查询中检测到的将要碰到的重叠。之后在UpdateOverlapsImpl中，将会使用该数组调用BeginComponentOverlap.
值得一提的是，即使我们当前的组件（后续我们就叫它Self组件吧）已经在其他组件的重叠里了，此时如果有移动行为的话，该数组仍会把已经重叠的组件保存进去，至于会不会重复触发BeginOverlap，后续当然有相关的逻辑处理，这里先按下不表。
如果当前没有移动，只是简单的对组件进行了旋转，那么这个数组将会是空的，可以查阅UPrimitiveComponent::MoveComponentImpl, 其中有这么一段代码:
TInlineOverlapInfoArray OverlapsAtEndLocation;
bool bHasEndOverlaps = false;
if (bRotationOnly)
{
bHasEndOverlaps = ConvertRotationOverlapsToCurrentOverlaps(OverlapsAtEndLocation, OverlappingComponents);
}
else
{
bHasEndOverlaps = ConvertSweptOverlapsToCurrentOverlaps(OverlapsAtEndLocation, PendingOverlaps, 0, GetComponentLocation(), GetComponentQuat());
}
TOverlapArrayView PendingOverlapsView(PendingOverlaps);
TOverlapArrayView OverlapsAtEndView(OverlapsAtEndLocation);
UpdateOverlaps(&PendingOverlapsView, true, bHasEndOverlaps ? &OverlapsAtEndView : nullptr);
有个bRotationOnly变量，如果只有旋转的话，不会对PendingOverlaps进行赋值。
也就是说，组件只做原地旋转的话，是不会有新的重叠开始事件的。
OverlapsAtEndLocation
If non-null, the given list of overlaps will be used as the overlaps for this component at the current location, rather than checking for them with a scene query.
Generally this should only be used if this component is the RootComponent of the owning actor and overlaps with other descendant components have been verified.
（机翻）如果非空，则给定的重叠列表将用作该组件在当前位置的重叠，而不是使用场景查询来检查它们。
一般来说，只有当这个组件是拥有Actor的RootComponent，并且与其他子组件的重叠已经被验证时，才应该使用这个组件。
说人话就是，这个数组将会存有Self组件当前位置（查询末端位置）的所有重叠，并且只有self组件是Actor的根组件时才应该使用这个数组。
bDoNotifies
True to dispatch being/end overlap notifications when these events occur.
用于判断是否触发重叠事件。例如，当bDoNotifies为false时，OnBeginComponentOverlap、OnBeginActorComponentOverlap、OnEndComponentOverlap等相关委托都不会被触发。
目前看来OverlapsAtEndLocation和NewPendingOverlaps的关系挺微妙的，随着后面代码的分析，他们的作用会越来越清晰。
调用该函数的几种情况
那么什么情况下需要更新组件的重叠呢？
很明显，当组件产生任何Transform的变换时，都应该更新重叠以防止漏过任何一个事件。
除此以外，当组件的碰撞状态发生变化时，也应该及时更新重叠。笔者经过对一个Character进行不严谨的调试，找到了几个比较典型的调用方式：
1. UCharacterMovementComponent::PerformMovement
该函数是移动组件进行移动的主要函数，该函数会结合碰撞查询，计算出组件移动的目标位置，调用栈如下：
也就是说当你控制角色，使用移动组件进行移动时，每tick都会对重叠进行一次更新。
2.UPrimiticeComponent::MoveComponent
该函数用于更新Actor的transform时调用。例如SetActorRotation，SetActorPosition等函数，最终都会调用到MoveComponent函数，并对重叠进行更新
3.AActor::SetActorEnableCollision
这类函数用于改变组件的碰撞状态，同理还有设置组件的通道类型等函数。当组件的碰撞状态发生改变时，都会调用一次UpdateOverlaps以更新重叠。
值得一提的是，这类函数对UpdateOverlaps调用的传参都是默认的，即传入的两个数组都是空值。这意味着更新重叠时不会引入新的重叠，只会对当前已记录的重叠进行操作。
// update overlaps once after all components have been updated
UpdateOverlaps();
真正更新重叠的实现函数：UPrimitiveComponent::UpdateOverlapsImpl
篇幅有限，笔者不会去详细讲解碰撞是如何查询并产生结果的，也不会去讲解组件移动具体会发生什么事情（因为笔者也没来得及弄懂）。现在只需要知道一个前提：UE能通过某种方式获得当前的碰撞信息，并存入前面提到的函数参数中的两个数组中。根据这个前提，接下来将围绕UpdateOverlapsImpl 函数对整个重叠更新进行详细的讲解。
总所周知，USceneComponent为Actor提供了表达自身空间信息的能力，可以为开发者提供Transform等信息，而碰撞相关的信息则交给了其子类UPrimitiveComponent。也就是说，只有继承了UPrimitiveComponent的类才能拥有碰撞处理的能力，否则这个组件就是空间中的一个幽灵，无法与世界进行任何交互。
而作为第一个拥有碰撞能力的组件，它拥有着一个足以彰显其身份的成员：
TArray OverlappingComponents;
Set of components that this component is currently overlapping.
含义很明显，保存了所有与当前组件重叠且能生成重叠事件的其他组件。记住这个组件，可以说一个组件的重叠更新始终是围绕着这个组件完成的。
对新加入的重叠进行处理
一开始是一些简单的判断。如果Actor还没有beginPlayer，将不会继续后续的逻辑。
紧随其后的，就是对NewPendingOverlaps数组进行处理，相关代码如下：
// first, dispatch any pending overlaps
if (GetGenerateOverlapEvents() && IsQueryCollisionEnabled())
{
bCanSkipUpdateOverlaps = false;
if (MyActor)
{
const FTransform PrevTransform = GetComponentTransform();
// If we are the root component we ignore child components. Those children will update their overlaps when we descend into the child tree.
// This aids an optimization in MoveComponent.
const bool bIgnoreChildren = (MyActor->GetRootComponent() == this);
if (NewPendingOverlaps)
{
// Note: BeginComponentOverlap() only triggers overlaps where GetGenerateOverlapEvents() is true on both components.
const int32 NumNewPendingOverlaps = NewPendingOverlaps->Num();
for (int32 Idx=0; Idx < NumNewPendingOverlaps; ++Idx)
{
BeginComponentOverlap( (*NewPendingOverlaps)[Idx], bDoNotifies );
}
}
.........
GetGenerateOverlapEvents() && IsQueryCollisionEnabled()
是否生成重叠事件&是否允许碰撞。
IsQueryCollisionEnabled()可以通过SetActorEnableCollision改变其状态；
GetGenerateOverlapEvents()可以在蓝图里勾选“生成重叠事件”或者改变bool值bGenerateOverlapEvents进行修改。
补充一点，只有两个组件都能生成重叠事件，才会触发双方的BeginOverlap事件。
注意到有一个bIgnoreChildren变量，当self组件为根组件时其为true。这意味着根组件始终不会考虑子组件的影响。而子组件呢，默认下是会与本Actor的其他组件发生碰撞的，实际使用中我们很少会考虑这种问题，但这里可以作为一个小细节记一下。
UPrimitiveComponent::BeginComponentOverlap(const FOverlapInfo& OtherOverlap, bool bDoNotifies)
之后将对NewPendingOverlaps进行一次完整的遍历。前面提到，NewPendingOverlaps可能包含已经重叠的组件，也可能包含还未重叠的组件。这些组件将在这个函数中进行统一处理，忽略已经重叠的组件，而未重叠的组件则调用双方的OnComponentBeginOverlap委托。
void UPrimitiveComponent::BeginComponentOverlap(const FOverlapInfo& OtherOverlap, bool bDoNotifies)
{
// If pending kill, we should not generate any new overlaps
if (!IsValid(this))
{
return;
}
const bool bComponentsAlreadyTouching = (IndexOfOverlapFast(OverlappingComponents, OtherOverlap) != INDEX_NONE);
if (!bComponentsAlreadyTouching)
{
UPrimitiveComponent* OtherComp = OtherOverlap.OverlapInfo.Component.Get();
if (CanComponentsGenerateOverlap(this, OtherComp))
{
GlobalOverlapEventsCounter++;
AActor* const OtherActor = OtherComp->GetOwner();
AActor* const MyActor = GetOwner();
const bool bSameActor = (MyActor == OtherActor);
const bool bNotifyActorTouch = bDoNotifies && !bSameActor && !AreActorsOverlapping(*MyActor, *OtherActor);
// Perform reflexive touch.
OverlappingComponents.Add(OtherOverlap); // already verified uniqueness above
AddUniqueOverlapFast(OtherComp->OverlappingComponents, FOverlapInfo(this, INDEX_NONE)); // uniqueness unverified, so addunique
const UWorld* World = GetWorld();
const bool bLevelStreamingOverlap = (bDoNotifies && MyActor->bGenerateOverlapEventsDuringLevelStreaming && MyActor->IsActorBeginningPlayFromLevelStreaming());
if (bDoNotifies && ((World && World->HasBegunPlay()) || bLevelStreamingOverlap))
{
// first execute component delegates
if (IsValid(this))
{
OnComponentBeginOverlap.Broadcast(this, OtherActor, OtherComp, OtherOverlap.GetBodyIndex(), OtherOverlap.bFromSweep, OtherOverlap.OverlapInfo);
}
if (IsValid(OtherComp))
{
// Reverse normals for other component. When it's a sweep, we are the one that moved.
OtherComp->OnComponentBeginOverlap.Broadcast(OtherComp, MyActor, this, INDEX_NONE, OtherOverlap.bFromSweep, OtherOverlap.bFromSweep ? FHitResult::GetReversedHit(OtherOverlap.OverlapInfo) : OtherOverlap.OverlapInfo);
}
// then execute actor notification if this is a new actor touch
if (bNotifyActorTouch)
{
// First actor virtuals
if (IsActorValidToNotify(MyActor))
{
MyActor->NotifyActorBeginOverlap(OtherActor);
}
if (IsActorValidToNotify(OtherActor))
{
OtherActor->NotifyActorBeginOverlap(MyActor);
}
// Then level-script delegates
if (IsActorValidToNotify(MyActor))
{
MyActor->OnActorBeginOverlap.Broadcast(MyActor, OtherActor);
}
if (IsActorValidToNotify(OtherActor))
{
OtherActor->OnActorBeginOverlap.Broadcast(OtherActor, MyActor);
}
}
}
}
}
}
逻辑并不难，主要做了以下几件事:
- 检查OverlappingComponents数组，判断该组件是否已重叠，如果未重叠就执行后面的逻辑
- CanComponentsGenerateOverlap 判断双方是否都能生成重叠事件，如果其中一方不能重叠，函数到这也就结束了
- 判断两个Actor是否已重叠，如果已重叠，后续则不会触发ActorOverlap事件
- 添加新的重叠到自己的OverlappingComponents中
- 将自己添加到对方的OverlappingComponents中
- 触发双方的ComponentBeginOverlap委托
- 触发双方的ActorBeginOverlap委托
可以看到，组件通过检查自己的OverlappingComponents数组来判断是否是已经触发的重叠，来规避重叠事件的重复触发。另外，主动触发重叠的一方会直接触发双方的重叠事件，因为重叠更新通常是在运动中触发的，如果其中一方不移动，只触发主动方的事件的话将会漏掉对方的重叠事件。
由于该函数会自动规避已重叠的组件，因此我们就不用费心思考虑是否会重复触发重叠开始事件了，这个后面也会用到。
在重叠开始事件中往往会存在各种各样的逻辑，其中包括移动、销毁、添加其他Actor等等逻辑，这些都是不可预测的，UE很明显考虑到了这一点，在重叠开始事件结束后，还需要再次检查当前的状态是否和之前有所改变。
另外，我们还需要考虑本次重叠更新调用时，是否有旧的重叠已失效，比如我们走出了重叠的范围，或是别的组件自己关闭了碰撞。
// now generate full list of new touches, so we can compare to existing list and determine what changed
TInlineOverlapInfoArray OverlapMultiResult;
TInlineOverlapPointerArray NewOverlappingComponentPtrs;
因此，代码里新定义了两个临时数组，其中OverlapMultiResult将会保存在新的位置重新重叠检测的结果；NewOverlappingComponentPtrs更重要一些，会保存当前重叠的指针，让我们继续往后看。
Self组件没有移动的情况
// Might be able to avoid testing for new overlaps at the end location.
if (OverlapsAtEndLocation != nullptr && bAllowCachedOverlapsCVar && PrevTransform.Equals(GetComponentTransform()))
{
const bool bCheckForInvalid = (NewPendingOverlaps && NewPendingOverlaps->Num() > 0);
if (bCheckForInvalid)
{
// BeginComponentOverlap may have disabled what we thought were valid overlaps at the end (collision response or overlap flags could change).
GetPointersToArrayDataByPredicate(NewOverlappingComponentPtrs, *OverlapsAtEndLocation, FPredicateFilterCanOverlap(*this));
}
else
{
GetPointersToArrayData(NewOverlappingComponentPtrs, *OverlapsAtEndLocation);
}
}
筛选OverlapsAtEndLocation，将当前能触发重叠事件的组件指针存入NewOverlappingComponentPtrs。
这里使用bCheckForInvalid做了一个小优化，如果NewPendingOverlaps为空，就意味着没有任何BeginOverlap事件，就不需要筛选OverlapsAtEndLocation了，毕竟始终没有机会改变。
Self组件有移动的情况（或OverlapsAtEndLocation为空的情况）
else
{
SCOPE_CYCLE_COUNTER(STAT_PerformOverlapQuery);
UE_LOG(LogPrimitiveComponent, VeryVerbose, TEXT("%s->%s Performing overlaps!"), *GetNameSafe(GetOwner()), *GetName());
UWorld* const MyWorld = GetWorld();
TArray Overlaps;
// note this will optionally include overlaps with components in the same actor (depending on bIgnoreChildren).
FComponentQueryParams Params(SCENE_QUERY_STAT(UpdateOverlaps), bIgnoreChildren ? MyActor : nullptr);
Params.bIgnoreBlocks = true; //We don't care about blockers since we only route overlap events to real overlaps
FCollisionResponseParams ResponseParam;
InitSweepCollisionParams(Params, ResponseParam);
ComponentOverlapMulti(Overlaps, MyWorld, GetComponentLocation(), GetComponentQuat(), GetCollisionObjectType(), Params);
for (int32 ResultIdx=0; ResultIdx < Overlaps.Num(); ResultIdx++)
{
const FOverlapResult& Result = Overlaps[ResultIdx];
UPrimitiveComponent* const HitComp = Result.Component.Get();
if (HitComp && (HitComp != this) && HitComp->GetGenerateOverlapEvents())
{
const bool bCheckOverlapFlags = false; // Already checked above
if (!ShouldIgnoreOverlapResult(MyWorld, MyActor, *this, Result.OverlapObjectHandle.FetchActor(), *HitComp, bCheckOverlapFlags))
{
OverlapMultiResult.Emplace(HitComp, Result.ItemIndex); // don't need to add unique unless the overlap check can return dupes
}
}
}
// Fill pointers to overlap results. We ensure below that OverlapMultiResult stays in scope so these pointers remain valid.
GetPointersToArrayData(NewOverlappingComponentPtrs, OverlapMultiResult);
}
当Self组件在BeginOverlap中发生了坐标的变化，那么我们就需要重新进行碰撞查询。这段代码看着复杂，其实也就只做了这一件事：调用ComponentOverlapMulti函数进行重叠查询，然后将新查询到的重叠的指针放入NewOverlappingComponentPtrs中。
另外，这里再次用到了bIgnoreChildren，说明UE真的很不想让根组件更新到子组件的重叠，据说是为了优化MoveComponent的流程？大概吧，但是这并不意味着子组件不会和根组件发生重叠事件，当子组件主动更新重叠时，仍会检测到根组件，并触发双方的重叠事件。
这里埋下了一个伏笔，这段函数还有一个触发条件，就是OverlapsAtEndLocation为空的情况。本以为是一个不起眼的判断，却为子组件的重叠更新埋下了伏笔。
整理出可能存在的新的重叠后，我们还需考虑旧的重叠是否已经失效，因此需要对比新旧重叠，来获取新增的和过时的重叠。
对比新旧重叠
缓存旧重叠
总之先把旧的重叠缓存一下吧，很显然，直到前面调用重叠开始事件之前，OverlappingComponents数组里都是“旧重叠”。
这里的代码定义了OldOverlappingComponentPtrs数组，缓存了旧重叠的指针，对应前面的NewOverlappingComponentPtrs数组。之后将OverlappingComponents的元素以指针的方式拷贝到OldOverlappingComponentPtrs中。
// If we have any overlaps from BeginComponentOverlap() (from now or in the past), see if anything has changed by filtering NewOverlappingComponents
if (OverlappingComponents.Num() > 0)
{
TInlineOverlapPointerArray OldOverlappingComponentPtrs;
if (bIgnoreChildren)
{
GetPointersToArrayDataByPredicate(OldOverlappingComponentPtrs, OverlappingComponents, FPredicateOverlapHasDifferentActor(*MyActor));
}
else
{
GetPointersToArrayData(OldOverlappingComponentPtrs, OverlappingComponents);
}
筛选新旧重叠
那么怎么判断哪些重叠是过时的，哪些重叠是新的呢？
我们现在手里有两个数组，一个是NewOverlappingComponentPtrs，保存了当前所有有效的重叠；另一个是OldOverlappingComponentPtrs，保存了曾经有效的重叠。
那么去除这两个数组重复的部分，我们就可以筛选出过时的重叠和新的需要触发重叠事件的重叠。他们之间的关系如下图所示。
// Now we want to compare the old and new overlap lists to determine
// what overlaps are in old and not in new (need end overlap notifies), and
// what overlaps are in new and not in old (need begin overlap notifies).
// We do this by removing common entries from both lists, since overlapping status has not changed for them.
// What is left over will be what has changed.
// 去除重复的部分
for (int32 CompIdx=0; CompIdx < OldOverlappingComponentPtrs.Num() && NewOverlappingComponentPtrs.Num() > 0; ++CompIdx)
{
// RemoveAtSwap is ok, since it is not necessary to maintain order
const bool bAllowShrinking = false;
const FOverlapInfo* SearchItem = OldOverlappingComponentPtrs[CompIdx];
const int32 NewElementIdx = IndexOfOverlapFast(NewOverlappingComponentPtrs, SearchItem);
if (NewElementIdx != INDEX_NONE)
{
NewOverlappingComponentPtrs.RemoveAtSwap(NewElementIdx, 1, bAllowShrinking);
OldOverlappingComponentPtrs.RemoveAtSwap(CompIdx, 1, bAllowShrinking);
--CompIdx;
}
}
最终，OldOverlappingComponentPtrs就只剩下了过时的，需要调用EndOverlap的重叠；NewOverlappingComponentPtrs剩下了新增的，需要调用BeginOverlap的重叠。
EndComponentOverlap
const int32 NumOldOverlaps = OldOverlappingComponentPtrs.Num();
if (NumOldOverlaps > 0)
{
// Now we have to make a copy of the overlaps because we can't keep pointers to them, that list is about to be manipulated in EndComponentOverlap().
TInlineOverlapInfoArray OldOverlappingComponents;
OldOverlappingComponents.SetNumUninitialized(NumOldOverlaps);
for (int32 i=0; i < NumOldOverlaps; i++)
{
OldOverlappingComponents[i] = *(OldOverlappingComponentPtrs[i]);
}
// OldOverlappingComponents now contains only previous overlaps that are confirmed to no longer be valid.
for (const FOverlapInfo& OtherOverlap : OldOverlappingComponents)
{
if (OtherOverlap.OverlapInfo.Component.IsValid())
{
EndComponentOverlap(OtherOverlap, bDoNotifies, false);
}
else
{
// Remove stale item. Reclaim memory only if it's getting large, to try to avoid churn but avoid bloating component's memory usage.
const bool bAllowShrinking = (OverlappingComponents.Max() >= 24);
const int32 StaleElementIndex = IndexOfOverlapFast(OverlappingComponents, OtherOverlap);
if (StaleElementIndex != INDEX_NONE)
{
OverlappingComponents.RemoveAtSwap(StaleElementIndex, 1, bAllowShrinking);
}
}
}
}
具体EndComponentOverlap发生了什么，基本和BeginCompoentOverlap反着来，笔者就不赘述了。
之后再将新的重叠遍历调用BeginCompoentOverlap，本次重叠更新的主要内容就基本结束了。
Self组件没开启碰撞的情况
还记得前面提到的GetGenerateOverlapEvents() && IsQueryCollisionEnabled()条件判断吗？对于调用了SetActorEnableCollision关闭Actor碰撞的情况，这里当然也是有考虑的。
// first, dispatch any pending overlaps
if (GetGenerateOverlapEvents() && IsQueryCollisionEnabled()) //TODO: should modifying query collision remove from mayoverlapevents?
{....}
else
{
// GetGenerateOverlapEvents() is false or collision is disabled
// End all overlaps that exist, in case GetGenerateOverlapEvents() was true last tick (i.e. was just turned off)
if (OverlappingComponents.Num() > 0)
{
const bool bSkipNotifySelf = false;
ClearComponentOverlaps(bDoNotifies, bSkipNotifySelf);
}
}
当OverlappingComponents数组里还有重叠，我们需要将这些重叠全部处理掉，也就是一一调用EndComponentOverlap，UE在这里将其写成了一个ClearComponentOverlaps函数。
ClearComponentOverlaps
void UPrimitiveComponent::ClearComponentOverlaps(bool bDoNotifies, bool bSkipNotifySelf)
{
if (OverlappingComponents.Num() > 0)
{
// Make a copy since EndComponentOverlap will remove items from OverlappingComponents.
const TInlineOverlapInfoArray OverlapsCopy(OverlappingComponents);
for (const FOverlapInfo& OtherOverlap : OverlapsCopy)
{
EndComponentOverlap(OtherOverlap, bDoNotifies, bSkipNotifySelf);
}
}
}
调用子组件的UpdateOverlap
在讲解这部分之前，必须强调很重要的一点：
前面提到的移动过程产生的重叠更新，是不会直接通过子组件调用的，必须通过根组件先调用UpdateOverlap，然后经过循环递归调用，才能触发子组件的UpdateOverlap。
然后呢，看看在根组件经过前面一大串的逻辑后，在这个函数的末尾，是如何调用子组件的UpdateOverlap的：
// now update any children down the chain.
// since on overlap events could manipulate the child array we need to take a copy
// of it to avoid missing any children if one is removed from the middle
TInlineComponentArray AttachedChildren;
AttachedChildren.Append(GetAttachChildren());
for (USceneComponent* const ChildComp : AttachedChildren)
{
if (ChildComp)
{
// Do not pass on OverlapsAtEndLocation, it only applied to this component.
bCanSkipUpdateOverlaps &= ChildComp->UpdateOverlaps(nullptr, bDoNotifies, nullptr);
}
}
先说一个小细节:在遍历子组件之前，先缓存了一份子组件，是因为子组件更新重叠的过程中，可能会自己脱离父组件，导致循环出现BUG，这点大家平时写代码的时候要注意一下。
我们可以看到最后调用了这样一行代码：
ChildComp->UpdateOverlaps(nullptr, bDoNotifies, nullptr);
然后发现传入的两个数组都是nullptr。
what？两个数组都是空指针的话，那么子组件还怎么更新重叠？
现在回过去看 Self组件有移动的情况（或OverlapsAtEndLocation为空的情况）这一节，会发现子组件会直接走这段逻辑，也就是现场判断组件在场景中的重叠的方式，之后再进行后面的逻辑。
至此，UpdateOverlap的流程就基本结束了。
根组件跳过子组件的重叠查询
断点调试发现，根组件在调用UpdateOverlaps的NewPendingOverlaps数组中，并没有任何子组件，哪怕子组件碰撞全开。
往上追溯，才发现UPrimitiveComponent::MoveComponentImpl里在重叠检测时还藏了一手：
FComponentQueryParams Params(SCENE_QUERY_STAT(MoveComponent), Actor);
FCollisionResponseParams ResponseParam;
InitSweepCollisionParams(Params, ResponseParam);
Params.bIgnoreTouches |= !(GetGenerateOverlapEvents() || bForceGatherOverlaps);
Params.TraceTag = TraceTagName;
bool const bHadBlockingHit = MyWorld->ComponentSweepMulti(Hits, this, TraceStart, TraceEnd, InitialRotationQuat, Params);
FComponentQueryParams Params的第二个参数就是要忽略的Actor，这里的Actor指的就是本身，所以检测的结果自然就没有自己的子组件了。
不过即便如此，如果子组件在碰撞上允许和根组件生成重叠事件时，在子组件的UpdateOverlaps还是不可避免地与根组件发生重叠关系。不过UE的注释里都提到了，这都是为了优化MovementCompoennt的移动流程。