-
Stream.toList()和Collectors.toList()的性能比较
昨天给大家介绍了Java 16中的Stream增强，可以直接通过toList()来转换成List。
主要涉及下面这几种转换方式：
list.stream().toList(); list.stream().collect(Collectors.toList()); list.stream().collect(Collectors.toUnmodifiableList());- 1
- 2
然后，看到有网友评论问：
Stream.toList()和Collectors.toList()的区别是什么？哪个性能好？
处理结果的区别，其实上一篇文章和视频里都有说：
Stream.toList()返回的List是不可变List，不能增删改Collectors.toList()返回的是个普通的List，可以增删改Collectors.toUnmodifiableList()返回的List是不可变List，不能增删改
而至于性能的话，今天我们就来测试一下，看看哪个性能更好。
@BenchmarkMode(Mode.All) @Fork(1) @State(Scope.Thread) @Warmup(iterations = 20, time = 1, batchSize = 10000) @Measurement(iterations = 20, time = 1, batchSize = 10000) public class BenchmarkStreamToList { @Benchmark public List<Integer> streamToList() { return IntStream.range(1, 1000).boxed().toList(); } @Benchmark public List<Integer> collectorsToList() { return IntStream.range(1, 1000).boxed().collect(Collectors.toList()); } @Benchmark public List<Integer> streamToList() { return IntStream.range(1, 1000).boxed().toList(); } }- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
结果报告：
Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList thrpt 20 24.422 ± 0.268 ops/s BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList thrpt 20 22.784 ± 0.599 ops/s BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList thrpt 20 31.779 ± 1.732 ops/s BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList avgt 20 0.045 ± 0.006 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList avgt 20 0.062 ± 0.035 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList avgt 20 0.040 ± 0.028 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList sample 445 0.046 ± 0.002 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.00 sample 0.039 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.50 sample 0.041 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.90 sample 0.057 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.95 sample 0.073 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.99 sample 0.102 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.999 sample 0.150 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.9999 sample 0.150 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p1.00 sample 0.150 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList sample 460 0.044 ± 0.001 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.00 sample 0.042 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.50 sample 0.044 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.90 sample 0.046 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.95 sample 0.047 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.99 sample 0.051 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.999 sample 0.057 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.9999 sample 0.057 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p1.00 sample 0.057 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList sample 655 0.031 ± 0.001 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.00 sample 0.030 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.50 sample 0.031 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.90 sample 0.032 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.95 sample 0.033 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.99 sample 0.035 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.999 sample 0.037 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.9999 sample 0.037 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p1.00 sample 0.037 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList ss 20 0.043 ± 0.001 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList ss 20 0.045 ± 0.004 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList ss 20 0.031 ± 0.001 s/op- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
从报告中我们可以看到：
- 吞吐量：
streamToList>collectorsToList>collectorsToUnmodifiableList - 平均耗时：
streamToList>collectorsToList>collectorsToUnmodifiableList - p0.9999耗时：
streamToList>collectorsToUnmodifiableList>collectorsToList - 冷启动耗时：
streamToList>collectorsToList>collectorsToUnmodifiableList
所以，
Stream.toList()的性能要各方面都要好于Collectors.toList()和Collectors.toUnmodifiableList()。如果您学习过程中如遇困难？可以加入我们超高质量的技术交流群，参与交流与讨论，更好的学习与进步！ 本文收录在了我正在连载的《Java新特性专栏》，该系列该用电子书的方式编写，如果想要沉浸式阅读学习的话，可以访问Web版本：https://www.didispace.com/java-features/
再放大一些数据量，试试：
@Benchmark public List<Integer> streamToList() { return IntStream.range(1, 10000).boxed().toList(); } @Benchmark public List<Integer> collectorsToList() { return IntStream.range(1, 10000).boxed().collect(Collectors.toList()); } @Benchmark public List<Integer> streamToList() { return IntStream.range(1, 10000).boxed().toList(); }- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
结果报告：
Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList thrpt 20 2.186 ± 0.162 ops/s BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList thrpt 20 2.184 ± 0.042 ops/s BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList thrpt 20 3.538 ± 0.058 ops/s BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList avgt 20 0.426 ± 0.004 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList avgt 20 0.469 ± 0.016 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList avgt 20 0.293 ± 0.008 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList sample 58 0.448 ± 0.049 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.00 sample 0.414 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.50 sample 0.422 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.90 sample 0.458 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.95 sample 0.560 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.99 sample 1.160 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.999 sample 1.160 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.9999 sample 1.160 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p1.00 sample 1.160 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList sample 60 0.458 ± 0.004 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.00 sample 0.447 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.50 sample 0.455 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.90 sample 0.471 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.95 sample 0.482 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.99 sample 0.492 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.999 sample 0.492 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.9999 sample 0.492 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p1.00 sample 0.492 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList sample 78 0.293 ± 0.012 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.00 sample 0.277 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.50 sample 0.284 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.90 sample 0.309 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.95 sample 0.377 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.99 sample 0.459 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.999 sample 0.459 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.9999 sample 0.459 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p1.00 sample 0.459 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList ss 20 0.474 ± 0.133 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList ss 20 0.493 ± 0.099 s/op BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList ss 20 0.325 ± 0.056 s/op- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
从报告中我们可以看到
- 吞吐量：
streamToList>collectorsToList>collectorsToUnmodifiableList - 平均耗时：
streamToList>collectorsToList>collectorsToUnmodifiableList - p0.9999耗时：
streamToList>collectorsToUnmodifiableList>collectorsToList - 冷启动耗时：
streamToList>collectorsToList>collectorsToUnmodifiableList
所以，即使集合内的元素增大，
Stream.toList()的性能在各方面依然都要好于Collectors下的方法。好了，今天的分享就到这里，你学会了吗？
本期视频：https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV16Y411F7Pm/
欢迎关注我的公众号：程序猿DD。前沿技术早知道，弯道超车有希望！积累超车资本，从关注DD开始！
-
相关阅读:
动态负荷对电力系统摆幅曲线的影响研究（Matlab代码实现）
app专项测试：app弱网测试
LeetCode 3.4.5题
主流编程语言介绍
Elasticsearch alias 使用
垃圾收集器与内存分配策略
软件设计模式白话文系列（十一）享元模式
应用安全系列之三十七：日志注入
ES & Kibana 简介
设计模式——结构型模式——责任链模式
- 原文地址：https://blog.csdn.net/dyc87112/article/details/124954044