• 记一次 .NET 某医疗住院系统 崩溃分析


    一:背景

    1. 讲故事

    最近收到了两起程序崩溃的dump,查了下都是经典的 double free 造成的,蛮有意思,这里就抽一篇出来分享一下经验供后面的学习者避坑吧。

    二:WinDbg 分析

    1. 崩溃点在哪里

    windbg 带了一个自动化分析命令 !analyze -v 可以帮助我们找到崩溃时的程序指令地址以及崩溃的代码,这对我们分析问题非常有帮助。

    
    0:090> !analyze -v
    *******************************************************************************
    *                                                                             *
    *                        Exception Analysis                                   *
    *                                                                             *
    *******************************************************************************
    CONTEXT:  (.ecxr)
    rax=00007ffec265d6e0 rbx=00000000c0000374 rcx=00000053653fe4f0
    rdx=00007ffec1d3e9a0 rsi=0000000000000001 rdi=00007ffed7b827f0
    rip=00007ffed7b1b349 rsp=00000053653fed10 rbp=000001c14fd20000
     r8=000001c11957d9a0  r9=0000000000000033 r10=000001c453dbc7f0
    r11=00007ffeb94db004 r12=0000000000000001 r13=000001c12e8526d0
    r14=0000000000000000 r15=000001ce25531c60
    iopl=0         nv up ei pl nz na po nc
    cs=0033  ss=002b  ds=002b  es=002b  fs=0053  gs=002b             efl=00000206
    ntdll!RtlReportFatalFailure+0x9:
    00007ffe`d7b1b349 eb00            jmp     ntdll!RtlReportFatalFailure+0xb (00007ffe`d7b1b34b)
    Resetting default scope
    
    EXCEPTION_RECORD:  (.exr -1)
    ExceptionAddress: 00007ffed7b1b349 (ntdll!RtlReportFatalFailure+0x0000000000000009)
       ExceptionCode: c0000374
      ExceptionFlags: 00000001
    NumberParameters: 1
       Parameter[0]: 00007ffed7b827f0
    
    PROCESS_NAME:  w3wp.exe
    ...
    
    

    熟悉 windows ntheap 的朋友应该知道,ExceptionCode: c0000374 是经典的 堆破坏 状态码,那到底是谁破坏了呢?

    2. 到底是谁破坏了NT堆

    windows 给了 ntheap 强大的调试支持,默认开启了 Termination on corruption 破坏检测,也就是说当你使用 !heap -s 的时候会显示具体破坏的详情记录,输出如下:

    
    0:090> !heap -s
    
    
    ************************************************************************************************************************
                                                  NT HEAP STATS BELOW
    ************************************************************************************************************************
    **************************************************************
    *                                                            *
    *                  HEAP ERROR DETECTED                       *
    *                                                            *
    **************************************************************
    
    Details:
    
    Heap address:  000001c14fd20000
    Error address: 000001ce25531c50
    Error type: HEAP_FAILURE_BLOCK_NOT_BUSY
    Details:    The caller performed an operation (such as a free
                or a size check) that is illegal on a free block.
    Follow-up:  Check the error's stack trace to find the culprit.
    
    
    Stack trace:
    Stack trace at 0x00007ffed7b82848
        00007ffed7abe109: ntdll!RtlpLogHeapFailure+0x45
        00007ffed7acbb0e: ntdll!RtlFreeHeap+0x9d3ce
        00007ffeb093276f: OraOps12!ssmem_free+0xf
        00007ffeb0943077: OraOps12!OpsMetFreeValCtx+0xd7
        00007ffeb093cdd8: OraOps12!OpsDacDispose+0x2b8
        00007ffe655e4374: +0x655e4374
    
    LFH Key                   : 0x5baf44f8068da60f
    Termination on corruption : ENABLED
              Heap     Flags   Reserv  Commit  Virt   Free  List   UCR  Virt  Lock  Fast 
                                (k)     (k)    (k)     (k) length      blocks cont. heap 
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    000001c14fd20000 00000002 1021576 964388 1020020  19222  6063   166    2    82f   LFH
    000001c14fc70000 00008000      64      4     64      2     1     1    0      0      
    ...
    
    

    上面的 Error type: HEAP_FAILURE_BLOCK_NOT_BUSY 表示是一个 double free,从 Stack trace 看是 OpsDacDispose 方法造成的,应该和 Oracle 相关,这就比较迷了。。。

    3. 是托管层触发的吗

    是不是托管层触发的呢?这就需要理解 Windows 独有的 SEH 异常处理机制,也就是说 Windows 的异常都会在 内核态 走一圈,画个图如下:

    只要找到 t1 时刻的崩溃点,然后观察线程栈即可,代码如下:

    
    0:090> .ecxr
    rax=00007ffec265d6e0 rbx=00000000c0000374 rcx=00000053653fe4f0
    rdx=00007ffec1d3e9a0 rsi=0000000000000001 rdi=00007ffed7b827f0
    rip=00007ffed7b1b349 rsp=00000053653fed10 rbp=000001c14fd20000
     r8=000001c11957d9a0  r9=0000000000000033 r10=000001c453dbc7f0
    r11=00007ffeb94db004 r12=0000000000000001 r13=000001c12e8526d0
    r14=0000000000000000 r15=000001ce25531c60
    iopl=0         nv up ei pl nz na po nc
    cs=0033  ss=002b  ds=002b  es=002b  fs=0053  gs=002b             efl=00000206
    ntdll!RtlReportFatalFailure+0x9:
    00007ffe`d7b1b349 eb00            jmp     ntdll!RtlReportFatalFailure+0xb (00007ffe`d7b1b34b)
    0:090> k
      *** Stack trace for last set context - .thread/.cxr resets it
     # Child-SP          RetAddr               Call Site
    00 00000053`653fed10 00007ffe`d7b1b313     ntdll!RtlReportFatalFailure+0x9
    01 00000053`653fed60 00007ffe`d7b23b9e     ntdll!RtlReportCriticalFailure+0x97
    02 00000053`653fee50 00007ffe`d7b23eaa     ntdll!RtlpHeapHandleError+0x12
    03 00000053`653fee80 00007ffe`d7abe109     ntdll!RtlpHpHeapHandleError+0x7a
    04 00000053`653feeb0 00007ffe`d7acbb0e     ntdll!RtlpLogHeapFailure+0x45
    05 00000053`653feee0 00007ffe`b093276f     ntdll!RtlFreeHeap+0x9d3ce
    06 00000053`653fef80 00007ffe`b0943077     OraOps12!ssmem_free+0xf
    07 00000053`653fefb0 00007ffe`b093cdd8     OraOps12!OpsMetFreeValCtx+0xd7
    08 00000053`653fefe0 00007ffe`655e4374     OraOps12!OpsDacDispose+0x2b8
    09 00000053`653ff060 00007ffe`655e31cf     0x00007ffe`655e4374
    0a 00000053`653ff150 00007ffe`6a80969d     0x00007ffe`655e31cf
    0b 00000053`653ff1f0 00007ffe`c4b96d06     0x00007ffe`6a80969d
    0c 00000053`653ff220 00007ffe`c4c30e81     clr!FastCallFinalizeWorker+0x6
    0d 00000053`653ff250 00007ffe`c4c30e09     clr!FastCallFinalize+0x55
    0e 00000053`653ff2a0 00007ffe`c4c30d3a     clr!MethodTable::CallFinalizer+0xb5
    0f 00000053`653ff2f0 00007ffe`c4c30bf5     clr!CallFinalizer+0x5e
    10 00000053`653ff330 00007ffe`c4c304dc     clr!FinalizerThread::DoOneFinalization+0x95
    11 00000053`653ff410 00007ffe`c4c31777     clr!FinalizerThread::FinalizeAllObjects+0xbf
    12 00000053`653ff450 00007ffe`c4b97d01     clr!FinalizerThread::FinalizeAllObjects_Wrapper+0x18
    13 00000053`653ff480 00007ffe`c4b97c70     clr!ManagedThreadBase_DispatchInner+0x39
    14 00000053`653ff4c0 00007ffe`c4b97bad     clr!ManagedThreadBase_DispatchMiddle+0x6c
    15 00000053`653ff5c0 00007ffe`c4b9ac34     clr!ManagedThreadBase_DispatchOuter+0x75
    16 00000053`653ff650 00007ffe`c4bf5271     clr!ManagedThreadBase_DispatchInCorrectAD+0x15
    17 00000053`653ff680 00007ffe`c4b9ac72     clr!Thread::DoADCallBack+0x109
    18 00000053`653ff830 00007ffe`c4c3172a     clr!ManagedThreadBase_DispatchInner+0x82
    19 00000053`653ff870 00007ffe`c4c304dc     clr!FinalizerThread::DoOneFinalization+0x1f1
    1a 00000053`653ff950 00007ffe`c4c3062b     clr!FinalizerThread::FinalizeAllObjects+0xbf
    1b 00000053`653ff990 00007ffe`c4b97d01     clr!FinalizerThread::FinalizerThreadWorker+0xbb
    1c 00000053`653ff9d0 00007ffe`c4b97c70     clr!ManagedThreadBase_DispatchInner+0x39
    1d 00000053`653ffa10 00007ffe`c4b97bad     clr!ManagedThreadBase_DispatchMiddle+0x6c
    1e 00000053`653ffb10 00007ffe`c4cf4d4a     clr!ManagedThreadBase_DispatchOuter+0x75
    1f 00000053`653ffba0 00007ffe`c4d5044f     clr!FinalizerThread::FinalizerThreadStart+0x126
    20 00000053`653ffc40 00007ffe`d6157e94     clr!Thread::intermediateThreadProc+0x86
    21 00000053`653ffd00 00007ffe`d7a87ad1     kernel32!BaseThreadInitThunk+0x14
    22 00000053`653ffd30 00000000`00000000     ntdll!RtlUserThreadStart+0x21
    
    0:090> !clrstack 
    OS Thread Id: 0x5634 (90)
            Child SP               IP Call Site
    00000053653ff0b8 00007ffed7abf0e4 [InlinedCallFrame: 00000053653ff0b8] Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OpsDac.Dispose(IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr ByRef, Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OpoMetValCtx*, Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OpoDacValCtx* ByRef, Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OpoSqlValCtx*, Int32, Int32)
    00000053653ff0b8 00007ffe655e4374 [InlinedCallFrame: 00000053653ff0b8] Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OpsDac.Dispose(IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr ByRef, Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OpoMetValCtx*, Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OpoDacValCtx* ByRef, Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OpoSqlValCtx*, Int32, Int32)
    00000053653ff060 00007ffe655e4374 DomainNeutralILStubClass.IL_STUB_PInvoke(IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr ByRef, Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OpoMetValCtx*, Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OpoDacValCtx* ByRef, Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OpoSqlValCtx*, Int32, Int32)
    00000053653ff150 00007ffe655e31cf Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OracleDataReader.Dispose(Boolean)
    00000053653ff1f0 00007ffe6a80969d Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OracleDataReader.Finalize()
    00000053653ff608 00007ffec4b96d06 [DebuggerU2MCatchHandlerFrame: 00000053653ff608] 
    00000053653ff788 00007ffec4b96d06 [ContextTransitionFrame: 00000053653ff788] 
    00000053653ff8d0 00007ffec4b96d06 [GCFrame: 00000053653ff8d0] 
    00000053653ffb58 00007ffec4b96d06 [DebuggerU2MCatchHandlerFrame: 00000053653ffb58] 
    
    

    从调用栈来看,原来是 终结器线程 在调用 OracleDataReader.Dispose() 方法的时候抛的异常,这个结果还是挺意外的,也就是说这个问题不是用户代码造成的,真的是 Oracle 这个 OraOps12.dll 造成的。。。

    接下来用 lm 观察下这个 dll 的详情信息,输出如下:

    
    0:090> lmDvmOraOps12
    Browse full module list
    start             end                 module name
    00007ffe`b0920000 00007ffe`b098c000   OraOps12 C (export symbols)       OraOps12.dll
        Loaded symbol image file: OraOps12.dll
        Image path: C:\ODAC\xxxx\OraOps12.dll
        Image name: OraOps12.dll
        Browse all global symbols  functions  data
        Timestamp:        Sat Sep 26 23:16:56 2015 (5606B6E8)
        CheckSum:         00000000
        ImageSize:        0006C000
        File version:     2.121.2.0
        Product version:  2.121.2.0
        File flags:       0 (Mask 3F)
        File OS:          4 Unknown Win32
        File type:        2.0 Dll
        File date:        00000000.00000000
        Translations:     0409.04b0
        Information from resource tables:
            CompanyName:      Oracle Corporation
            ProductName:      Oracle Data Provider for .NET
            InternalName:     OraOps
            OriginalFilename: OraOps12.dll
            ProductVersion:   2.121.2.0 ODAC RELEASE 4
            FileVersion:      2.121.2.0
            FileDescription:  Oracle Provider Services
            LegalCopyright:   Copyright © 2014
    
    

    虽然对 Oracle 不熟,但从 Timestamp: Sat Sep 26 23:16:56 2015 来看应该是一个比较老的 DLL 了,所以给到朋友的建议就是升级 OraOps12.dll

    4. 是否有同行者

    有时候直接让朋友升级dll有点缺少底气,最好就是找到一些同行者,经过一顿搜索,还真有同行者,又多了一份说服力,网址: https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/iis-support-blog/w3wp-exe-crash-exception-code-0xc0000005/ba-p/334351

    三:总结

    在百加dump的分析旅程中,碰到和 Oracle SDK 相关的也有 3+ 起了,可能也许这些 SDK 在对接 .NET 上还不是特别稳健,大家在使用上尽量更新到最新版本吧,且用且珍惜!

    图片名称
  • 相关阅读:
    keycloak~AbstractJsonUserAttributeMapper的作用
    C语言《超详细解析内存函数》
    Bootstrap5 表格
    电脑重装系统u盘文件被隐藏要怎么找出来
    [附源码]Python计算机毕业设计Django疫情管理系统
    【书籍篇】Git 学习指南(一)基础概念及入门
    [MRCTF2020]你传你呢
    prometheus的rules配置
    idea无法添加spring MVC框架支持
    Dubbo学习记录(六)--Spring整合Dubbo中的Dubbo配置文件流程解析(二)
  • 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/huangxincheng/p/17248323.html