kafka学习之三_信创CPU下单节点kafka性能测试验证
背景
前面学习了 3controller+5broker 的集群部署模式.
晚上想着能够验证一下国产机器的性能. 但是国产机器上面的设备有限.
所以想着进行单节点的安装与测试. 并且记录一下简单结果
希望对以后的工作有指导意义
发现producer的性能比较与之前的 测试结果比较接近.
但是consumer的测试结果看不出太多头绪来.
自己对kafka的学习还不够深入, 准备下一期就进行consumer的调优验证.
测试结果验证
| CPU类型 |
producer测试结果 |
consumer测试结果 |
| sw 3231 |
7.20 MB/sec |
2.62 MB/sec |
| FT 2500 |
2.17 MB/sec |
测试失败 |
| 海光 7285 |
39.20 MB/sec |
5.77 MB/sec |
| 鲲鹏920 |
41.97 MB/sec |
5.6037 MB/sec |
| 倚天710 |
59.73 MB/sec |
6.19 MB/sec |
| AMD 9T34 |
72.61 MB/sec |
6.68 MB/sec |
测试结果
广告一下自己的公众号
以申威为例进行安装说明
因为kafka 其实是基于java进行编写的消息队列.
所以不需要有繁杂的编译等过程.
只要jdk支持, 理论上就可以进行运行.
比较麻烦的就是稳定性和性能的表现.
所以这里进行一下安装与验证.
安装过程-1
上传文件到/root目录下面并且解压缩
cd /root && tar -zxvf kafka_2.13-3.5.0.tgz
然后编辑对应的文件:
cat > /root/kafka_2.13-3.5.0/config/kafka_server_jaas.conf <<EOF
KafkaServer {
org.apache.kafka.common.security.plain.PlainLoginModule required
username="admin"
password="Testxxxxxx"
user_admin="Testxxxxxx"
user_comsumer="Testxxxxxx"
user_producer="Testxxxxxx";
};
EOF
cat > /root/kafka_2.13-3.5.0/config/sasl.conf <<EOF
sasl.jaas.config=org.apache.kafka.common.security.plain.PlainLoginModule required username="admin" password="Testxxxxxx";
security.protocol=SASL_PLAINTEXT
sasl.mechanism=PLAIN
EOF
安装过程-2
vim /root/kafka_2.13-3.5.0/config/kraft/server.properties
主要修改的点:
因为是单节点所以比较简单了:
process.roles=broker,controller
node.id=100
controller.quorum.voters=100@127.0.0.1:9094
listeners=SASL_PLAINTEXT://127.0.0.1:9093,CONTROLLER://127.0.0.1:9094
sasl.enabled.mechanisms=PLAIN
sasl.mechanism.inter.broker.protocol=PLAIN
security.inter.broker.protocol=SASL_PLAINTEXT
allow.evervone.if.no.acl.found=true
advertised.listeners=SASL_PLAINTEXT://127.0.0.1:9093
vim->:1,50d->paste->edit_ips
其他ip地址可以如此替换:
sed -i 's/127.0.0.1/10.110.136.41/g' /root/kafka_2.13-3.5.0/config/kraft/server.properties
安装过程-3
修改启动脚本:
vim /root/kafka_2.13-3.5.0/bin/kafka-server-start.sh
在任意一个java opt 处增加:
-Djava.security.auth.login.config=/root/kafka_2.13-3.5.0/config/kafka_server_jaas.conf
安装过程-4
/root/kafka_2.13-3.5.0/bin/kafka-storage.sh random-uuid
cd /root/kafka_2.13-3.5.0
bin/kafka-storage.sh format -t 7ONT3dn3RWWNCZyIwLrEqg -c config/kraft/server.properties
cd /root/kafka_2.13-3.5.0 && bin/kafka-server-start.sh -daemon config/kraft/server.properties
bin/kafka-topics.sh --create --command-config config/sasl.conf --replication-factor 1 --partitions 3 --topic zhaobsh01 --bootstrap-server 127.0.0.1:9093
bin/kafka-producer-perf-test.sh --num-records 100000 --record-size 1024 --throughput -1 --producer.config config/sasl.conf --topic zhaobsh01 --print-metrics --producer-props bootstrap.servers=127.0.0.1:9093
bin/kafka-consumer-perf-test.sh --fetch-size 10000 --messages 1000000 --topic zhaobsh01 --consumer.config config/sasl.conf --print-metrics --bootstrap-server 127.0.0.1:9093
tail -f /root/kafka_2.13-3.5.0/logs/kafkaServer.out
申威的测试结果
producer:
100000 records sent, 7370.283019 records/sec (7.20 MB/sec), 2755.49 ms avg latency, 3794.00 ms max latency, 3189 ms 50th, 3688 ms 95th, 3758 ms 99th, 3785 ms 99.9th.
consumer:
start.time, end.time, data.consumed.in.MB, MB.sec, data.consumed.in.nMsg, nMsg.sec, rebalance.time.ms, fetch.time.ms, fetch.MB.sec, fetch.nMsg.sec
2023-06-20 21:56:02:493, 2023-06-20 21:56:39:755, 97.6563, 2.6208, 100000, 2683.6992, 5599, 31663, 3.0842, 3158.2604
飞腾的测试结果-hdd
producer:
100000 records sent, 1828.922582 records/sec (1.79 MB/sec), 6999.20 ms avg latency, 51476.00 ms max latency, 875 ms 50th, 21032 ms 95th, 21133 ms 99th, 21167 ms 99.9th.
consumer:
飞腾的测试结果-ssd
producer:
100000 records sent, 2219.706555 records/sec (2.17 MB/sec), 7073.51 ms avg latency, 41100.00 ms max latency, 1089 ms 50th, 20816 ms 95th, 20855 ms 99th, 20873 ms 99.9th.
海光的测试结果
producer:
100000 records sent, 40144.520273 records/sec (39.20 MB/sec), 486.67 ms avg latency, 681.00 ms max latency, 456 ms 50th, 657 ms 95th, 674 ms 99th, 678 ms 99.9th.
consumer:
start.time, end.time, data.consumed.in.MB, MB.sec, data.consumed.in.nMsg, nMsg.sec, rebalance.time.ms, fetch.time.ms, fetch.MB.sec, fetch.nMsg.sec
2023-06-20 22:28:04:364, 2023-06-20 22:28:21:274, 97.6563, 5.7751, 100000, 5913.6606, 3809, 13101, 7.4541, 7633.0051
鲲鹏的测试结果
producer:
100000 records sent, 42973.785991 records/sec (41.97 MB/sec), 463.69 ms avg latency, 621.00 ms max latency, 472 ms 50th, 593 ms 95th, 612 ms 99th, 619 ms 99.9th.
consumer:
start.time, end.time, data.consumed.in.MB, MB.sec, data.consumed.in.nMsg, nMsg.sec, rebalance.time.ms, fetch.time.ms, fetch.MB.sec, fetch.nMsg.sec
2023-06-20 22:33:58:168, 2023-06-20 22:34:15:595, 97.6563, 5.6037, 100000, 5738.2223, 3799, 13628, 7.1659, 7337.8339
倚天的测试结果
producer:
100000 records sent, 61162.079511 records/sec (59.73 MB/sec), 335.18 ms avg latency, 498.00 ms max latency, 326 ms 50th, 476 ms 95th, 494 ms 99th, 497 ms 99.9th.
consumer:
start.time, end.time, data.consumed.in.MB, MB.sec, data.consumed.in.nMsg, nMsg.sec, rebalance.time.ms, fetch.time.ms, fetch.MB.sec, fetch.nMsg.sec
2023-06-20 22:37:49:668, 2023-06-20 22:38:05:426, 97.6563, 6.1972, 100000, 6345.9830, 3597, 12161, 8.0303, 8223.008
AMD9T34的测试结果
producer:
100000 records sent, 74349.442379 records/sec (72.61 MB/sec), 253.07 ms avg latency, 364.00 ms max latency, 259 ms 50th, 344 ms 95th, 359 ms 99th, 363 ms 99.9th.
consumer:
start.time, end.time, data.consumed.in.MB, MB.sec, data.consumed.in.nMsg, nMsg.sec, rebalance.time.ms, fetch.time.ms, fetch.MB.sec, fetch.nMsg.sec
2023-06-20 22:44:14:446, 2023-06-20 22:44:29:058, 97.6563, 6.6833, 100000, 6843.6901, 3504, 11108, 8.7915, 9002.5207